1) There are many issues with the American health care system, either 1 out of every 6 adults don’t currently have health insurance or those who do have it don’t have coverage that is sufficient enough to really be called “health insurance.” Just because people can apply for health insurance doesn’t mean that they can necessarily gain health insurance. In America all the incentives are towards less Medicare for the people who need it. There are other counties that have health care systems that are considered to be socialist practices; these countries include Canada and France as well as other parts of Europe.
2)
A. Medicare drug act of 2003 and 50 million adults don’t have health insurance
B. the Medicare drug act of 2003 was important to proving his thesis because it described how the health care system got to be broken and how the government officials were aware of what they were doing and didn’t care or weren’t aware of the outcome of their actions regardless of who was harmed. The statistic that there are 50 billion adults without health insurance didn’t support Michael Moore’s argument, that even people with health insurance don’t have security. Although the statistic did cause an immediate reaction of “oh my gosh that can’t be true” Michal Moore was attempting to shock the audience in a way that they “felt” something and were connected and entertained by the movie.
D. the Medicare drug act of 2003 was “intended” to give seniors and the disabled more prescription drug benefits and more choices to those under Medicare, but it really gave the right for drug companies to charge whatever they like for their medication (they are allowed to price gouge). This piece of evidence is legitimate because it attempts to show the audience about how the current healthcare system became the way it is today. The evidence is accurate based on my sources (http://socialistworker.org/2007-2/636/636_04_Killing.shtml) and (https://www.cms.gov/mmaupdate/)
3)Reaction: it was most important to hear the individual experiences, in America, Canada and in Europe. This was helpful because it was brought down to a humane level there wasn’t any big figures or complicated laws involved, it was simply…person A and B can’t pay for their co pays on their medication and now person A must clean bathrooms and spills in grocery stores until he dies. I think the feeling of sadness is the most crucial when watching this movie because the feelings of shock and astonishment of “how could this be happening this is horrible, let’s change this” are very short term where as feeling sadness towards people, with lives and families and thoughts and feelings of their own are more sustained. I don’t think the movie affected my views about the dominant practices in our culture mainly because I couldn’t explain ½ of the concepts Michal Moore spoke about, it was a good movie for the moment but once the moment is over we all go on living our lives the same way we did before we saw Sicko.